home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ The Supreme Court / The Supreme Court.iso / pc / briefs / 1992 / 92_1180 / 1180r005.tif (.png) < prev    next >
Tagged Image File Format  |  1995-08-30  |  54KB  |  1696x2200
Labels: book | bulletin board | poster | reckoner | sky | vegetarianism
OCR: TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGH STATEMENT OF THE CASE SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT -..... ARGUMENT THE SEIZURE OF GOOD HOME VIOLATED THE DUE PROX ESS CLAUSE BECAUSE "EXTRAORDINARY DID NOT EXIST TO PERMIT THE SEIZURE WITHOUT NOTICE AND HEARINC Due Piocess Normally Requires Notice and an Opportunity To Be Heard Before a Significant Property Deprivation. No "Extraordinary Circumstances' Were Presert to Allow the Govemment two Avoid a Hearing Under the Mathews Eldridge Test. Adversarial Hearing Was Required Before Seizure. 23 The Fourth Amendment is Not the Source of the Minimum Requirements fo1 Gavermmental Takings of Frivate Property Good Should Be Awarded the Back Rent If He Prevails on the Due Process Issue THIS ACTION MUST BE DISMISSED IF NOT TIMELY COMMENCED UNDER 19US.C $1602 1604 40 U.5C 1602 1604 Requi ...